Who it’s for
One dataset.
Four perspectives.
Dr. Elevage is designed to support different stakeholders with the same underlying condition data — from maintenance companies and property owners to inspection firms and risk teams. Here is what that data means from each perspective.
Start with the data. Confirm it on site.
Add continuous condition monitoring and diagnostic insight to your existing maintenance service. Identify developing anomalies earlier, narrow the inspection scope, and verify maintenance outcomes with before-and-after data.
- Routes set by the calendar, so the healthy units get the same visit as the failing one
- Diagnosis happens on site, which means the part is ordered after the trip, not before it
- Mixed-brand fleets you cannot monitor at all, because no OEM platform will connect them
- Renewals argued on price, because quality of work is invisible to the customer
- The senior technician’s ear retiring with the senior technician
- Dispatch by measured risk — the unit that needs you today is at the top of the list, with the component already named
- Arrive with a clearer idea of where to investigate, so the right parts and tools can be prepared before the visit
- Verify the suspected issue and the repair outcome on site with the Portable Inspector
- Take on mixed-brand and orphaned fleets you previously had to decline
- Win renewals with a before/after report the customer can read without you in the room
Protect the asset. Prove the spend.
See how each elevator is actually running — not just when it was last inspected. Track developing issues, review maintenance outcomes, and keep a continuous record of equipment condition.
- Budgeting from vendor quotes rather than from condition data
- No way to tell which of your units genuinely needs money this quarter
- Faults discovered by residents complaining, which is the most expensive possible detection method
- A compliance file that is a folder of signed sheets
- "Repair-as-maintenance" — paying for the same fault more than once
- A health profile per unit, so capital reserve decisions are made on trend data
- Rank your own portfolio by risk and fund it in that order
- Close out faults before residents notice them — the cheapest detection method there is
- Hold the vendor to a measured outcome instead of an invoice
- A compliance record generated from passive data, ready before anyone asks
Bring measurement to the inspection.
Extend the evidence available for technical assessment with continuous vibration and acoustic data between site visits. Review trends, compare operating conditions, and trace findings back to the underlying measurements.
- Different inspectors, different techniques, different days — results that are hard to compare
- Subjective judgment that is difficult to defend when it is challenged
- Test points you cannot reach because there is no power there
- Findings delivered as a conclusion, with nothing underneath it the client can inspect
- A standardized procedure — same sensor configuration, same data format, every unit and every inspector
- Vibration, acoustic and speed curves embedded directly in the report
- No mains supply needed on site, magnetic mounting — so the counterweight and machine room stop being "not accessible"
- Voice annotation on site, so a field observation stays attached to the exact data it refers to
- Traceable measurement records when a finding is reviewed or challenged — the measurement can simply be repeated
Price the risk you can actually see.
Build a more consistent view of equipment condition across a portfolio. Use continuous operating data and traceable anomaly records to support risk review and follow-up.
- Premiums priced on class averages, so well-maintained fleets subsidize poorly-maintained ones
- Claims investigated with conflicting witness accounts and incomplete maintenance logs
- No way to reward the behavior you actually want to encourage
- Reactive posture — you find out about a risk when it becomes a claim
- A consistent, comparable condition-risk grade per insured unit, supported by operating data
- Differentiate premiums on actual exposure rather than on class
- A complete, passively collected log before, during and after an incident
- Identify high-risk units for proactive loss prevention, before the claim
- Reward the fleets that genuinely maintain — and be able to prove which those are
Not sure which seat you’re in? Most of our customers sit in two of them at once — tell us your situation and we’ll say which deployment we’d actually recommend.