Home/Evidence/Traction machine

Case study 01 · Early warning

Two months of trend data revealed a developing traction-machine fault before failure.

Traction machine fault Traction machine 15-year-old unit Fixed Monitor

The situation

A 15-year-old elevator in a commercial building: rated load 1000 kg, around 500 trips a day. The maintenance team inspected it every month, and when the first signs of trouble appeared, every item on the monthly checklist was still within tolerance. By every measure available to them, the unit was fine.

But a Dr. Elevage Fixed Monitor on the car top had been recording vibration and sound on every trip, and comparing each one against the baseline it had built for this unit. The system had already raised a warning.

What the data showed

Three trips recorded by the same sensor on the same elevator, as the fault developed. Gray is the vertical (Z) axis, red is its smoothed trend — and watch the vertical scale grow.

Normal run at installation: smooth three-phase curve初装时的正常运行曲线
01At installation · normal

A textbook run curve

  • Horizontal (X, Y) vibration stays small.
  • Vertical (Z) traces the three phases of a trip cleanly: accelerate, cruise, decelerate.
  • Vertical scale: ±0.7 m/s².
Early anomaly: impacts appear and the start-up curve distorts异常初现:出现冲击,启动段曲线畸变
02First signs · system warning

The curve starts to bend

  • The car is taking impacts; the ride is no longer smooth.
  • Up and down speeds begin to drift apart, slightly.
  • At down-start, the acceleration curve loses its regular shape.
Critical stage: repeated heavy impacts across the whole trip故障临界:全程多次强烈冲击
03Critical · alarm before shutdown

On the edge of a breakdown

  • Vertical acceleration is no longer stable; heavy impacts recur on every trip.
  • The gap between up and down speeds has grown from 0.06 to 0.24 m/s.
  • Recurring abnormal noise.

Screenshots from the Dr. Elevage mobile app; curves are recorded data, unedited. Unit identity withheld.

Why the monthly check did not see it

In the early stage, the fault usually stays hidden during a routine slow-speed maintenance run. Site visits are short and the anomaly is brief: a barely perceptible sway that is easily written off as normal aging. The continuous data said otherwise — the change had already happened, and that is exactly the moment to step in.

0.06→0.24m/s · gap between up and down speeds, early stage vs. critical
×4the speed gap, from first warning to the edge of shutdown
Abnormal noise at the critical stage · audio spectrogramEnergylowhigh
Audio spectrogram with repeated bright vertical streaks

Each bright vertical streak is one abnormal noise: short, sharp, and spread from the low end up into the kilohertz range.

What the team found

The maintenance team received the alert and scheduled an inspection. On examination, a fault was confirmed in the traction machine. If left unaddressed, the condition could have progressed to an unplanned shutdown and increased the risk of entrapment.

The outcome

Because the trend had been visible for two months, the traction machine was repaired in a planned window, with the parts already on site. No business disruption, no emergency call-out rate, no entrapment, and no conversation with a building owner about why their elevator stopped without warning.

The traction machine was going to need work either way. The only variable was whether the building found out on a Tuesday afternoon of its own choosing, or on a Friday evening of the machine’s.